Any
television programme that explores controversial subjects - domestic violence,
racism or paedophilia - inevitably attracts attention. In fact, some would say
that TV complaints function as a barometer of society's attitudes towards
complex issues.
Last year, for example, 200
people complained about
the appropriateness of an EastEnders storyline which featured a 15 year-old
girl who had been groomed by her mother's boyfriend since she was 12. A
month later over 100 people complained when
a Muslim character in the same programme broke his fast during Ramadan.
What
about homosexuality? Consider the intense media hype fifteen years ago when Brookside's
Anna Friel kissed her best friend in the UK's first ever pre-nine-o'clock
watershed lesbian kiss. Today, gay storylines are ten-a-penny in British soaps ...
EastEnders
has announced that next month's plot will involve an interfaith gay
relationship - between a Muslim and a cultural Christian. Newcomer to the
square Syed Masood is set to fall for Walford's only openly gay man Christian
Clarke and the pair will share an on-screen kiss.
Clarke's last on-screen kiss with then
boyfriend Lee offended Walford's resident busybody Dot Cotton - and apparently nearly
150 members of the British public too. Reactions to Masood and Clarke's
kiss will be interesting.
Ashgar Bukhari, co-founder and spokesperson for the Muslim
Public Affairs Committee UK (MPAC UK) - a Muslim organisation which claims to "defend
civil liberties" - ironically had this to say on the matter yesterday:
"The Muslim community deserves a
character that represents them to the wider public because Islamophobia is so
great right now.
"There's a lack of understanding of
Muslims already and I think EastEnders really lost an opportunity to present a
normal friendly Muslim character to the British public."
So, what, gay Muslims are abnormal and unfriendly then?
Why does the BBC - and other mainstream media - continue to
give a platform to bigots like Bukhari, a man who glorifies terrorism, has donated money
to holocaust denier David Irving and who is banned from UK campuses for his
virulent anti-Semitism?
Isn't it about time the UK media realised - as the EastEnders
scriptwriters have - that British Muslims are not a monolithic bloc and deserve
better than to spoken for by retrograde self-appointed "community leaders"?
EastEnders executive producer has defended the storyline saying it is
important for soaps to tackle issues which reflect real life. "This isn't
a moral tale of right or wrong; it's very much a human interest story where a
young man struggles with the conflict between his faith and his feelings,"
he added.
Granted, EastEnders - where everyone seems to
be related, have slept together or have at the very least attempted to kill one
another - is not known for its realism. However, the story of a young man trapped
between fulfilling his own wishes and those of his family, who are keen to see
him settled down with a "good woman", is one I think many will relate to.
Yusuf Wehebi, from Imaan, a Muslim LGBT
support organisation, would agree. "It
is entirely possible to be Muslim and gay and there's many of us in Britain
today," he said.
"It is high time that the invisible
minority became a visible minority. It is great that the BBC have had the
courage to raise such an important social issue in our society today."
He is right. Attitudes towards homosexuality
in the UK are still far from where they should be. As a Stonewall spokesperson said today, "The law has changed, but
society needs to catch up." Last month's Gallup poll - a global
study of interfaith relations - found that only a slight majority of the
general British public (58%) feels that homosexuality is morally acceptable. Interestingly,
not one of the 500 British Muslims surveyed agreed.
The BBC has, in the past, been accused of treading softly around religious
and cultural issues. Last year, for example, comedian Harry Enfield was forced
to scrap two sketches - a sex-crazed Muslim hoodie and a paedophile Catholic
priest - that satirised religion after the BBC said "it might cause trouble."
But isn't it exactly the issues that might "cause
trouble" - such as Muslim homosexuality - that need to explored openly? Literature
and the Arts - if Eastenders can be included in this category - have a long
history of satirising society and forcing people to rethink the status quo.


In the Islam on Campus report, Muslim and non-Muslim students were asked about respect for homosexuals. It appears, however, that only the non-Muslim students were offered "I am gay/lesbian" as a choice. Why?
It might also be argued that schools are grooming children as young as 5 to be homosexuals.
"Pupils as young as five were left 'confused and worried' after a school assembly to explain homosexuality.
Teachers played a recording of Elton John's Your Song before explaining that the singer is homosexual and what the term means.
The children were then shown images of same-sex couples"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1191097/Anger-school-tells-children-aged-gay-issues-sound-Elton-John.html
I have been gripped by the recent Eastenders gay muslim storyline.
I myself have a son who eventually came out as gay when he was eighteen after a long struggle with himself.
Though we as afamily aren't muslims I had been brought up as a Christian, was very prejudiced,believing that active homosexuality was sinful,and I did not hesitate to verbalise my views while not realising my son's situation.
When he came out I did make it my business to educate myself about the issue and quickly learned that being gay is not a choice.
I believe that if leaders and members of the main religions educated themselves about the biological causes then much pain would be avoided. Yours Sincerely
Maggie,Cornwall