The nativist response to the Swiss minaret ban

| 5 Comments | No TrackBacks
This is a guest post by CSC Research intern, Deborah Garel:

The response to the Swiss ban on minarets has triggered extensive criticisms from most other European governments. Nonetheless, it has inspired European nativist parties to take similar measures, revealing a fear of Islam felt by some European communities and the desire of extremist parties to exploit this.
All over Europe, nativist parties have expressed their support for the Swiss initiative and a desire to have it implemented in their respective countries.      

 

  • Italy: Mario Borghezio, who represents Italy in the European Parliament and is a member of Italy's anti-immigration Northern League Party, reacted to the criticisms concerning the Swiss reform. He declared that "the flag of a courageous Switzerland which wants to remain Christian is flying over a near-Islamised Europe." The Northern League minister Roberto Calderoni stressed his colleague's opinion by saying that "Switzerland is sending us a clear signal: yes to bell towers, no to minarets."
  • The Netherlands: The anti-Islam Freedom party is growing in popularity. Reacting to the Swiss initiative, its leader Geert Wilders advocated the implementation of a similar reform in Holland. Wilders called it "the first time that people in Europe have stood up to a form of Islamisation." He expressed his desire to call for a similar referendum, stating that "What can be done in Switzerland can be done here".
  • Denmark: The Danish People's Party has the same aspiration. Its leader Pia Kjaersgaard declared her wish to undergo a similar referendum in Denmark.
  • France: Marie Le Pen, the leader of the Front National, supports the Swiss decision on the basis that the "elites should stop denying the aspirations and fears of the European people, who, without opposing religious freedom, reject ostentatious signs that political-religious Muslim groups want to impose."
  • Austria: The far-right Alliance for the Future of Austria also supported the ban on minaret, sating that "as long as fanatic Islamists describe their mosques as army barracks ... we will prevent building such installations to protect our democracy, human rights and freedom."
  • Belgium: Fillip Dewinter of the Vlaams Belang party also backed the Swiss measure, claiming that the ban on minarets "is a signal that they have to adapt to our way of life and not the other way around."                                                                                         


In Switzerland, shortly after the announcement of the ban on minarets, the conservative leader Christophe Darbellay escalated the debate and demanded further reforms. He called for a ban on the wearing of the burka and on Jewish cemeteries. He does not request the destruction of existing cemeteries but he declared that there should not be separate cemeteries in the future.


The presence of minarets in European countries is an especially pertinent one at present. In Germany, right wing groups condemned the building of a mosque in Cologne that started in early November 2009. They claimed that a high minaret would ruin the city's skyline. In Copenhagen, the construction of two grand mosques is also a controversial subject.  Similarly, the decision to build a large mosque with a 25 meter high minaret in Marseille has activated an agitated debate.

 

The Swiss reform comes after previous debates concerning the integration of the wide Muslim community in Europe and the latter's measure to keep its cultural identity, such as the debate over the wearing of the Muslim veil. Similar controversies occurred in France in 2004 and in Belgium in 2009, when the government forbade the wearing of head scarves (including hijabs and burkas) in public schools.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.socialcohesion.co.uk/mt2/mt-tb.cgi/415

5 Comments

I found this article very informative and very interesting, very pleased.

I found this post helpful for my study. Thanks.

- Vincent T.
London

I think you will find a very wide cross-section of people support the Swiss. Or those who don't like the ban have kept very quite! See these two items.

The Swiss Minaret Ban – The Yawning Gap between Politicians and People
http://libertyphile2.blogspot.com/2009/12/swiss-minaret-ban-yawning-gap-between.html

My compatriots' vote to ban minarets is fuelled by fear
http://libertyphile2.blogspot.com/2009/12/my-compatriots-vote-to-ban-minarets-is.html

I am interested in the field of social cohesion. Now I am writing some articles about social cohesion in Iran and western countries. I have just recently found your blog. Please read my notes and help me with your guidance.

Hi,

If you are to be quoted for other people studies, it would be great to get the name of foreign political figures right: Marie Le Pen does not exist; Marine does.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_Le_Pen

Sincerely,
Flo

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Robin Simcox published on December 7, 2009 12:11 PM.

Another Huge Blow to Bunglawala's Credibility was the previous entry in this blog.

Islam on Campus is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.