Times Square bomber pleads guilty

| No TrackBacks
This is a guest post by CSC Research intern, Sara Rubin.

Faisal Shahzad, accused of attempting to bomb Times Square, has pleaded guilty to all ten counts for which he was charged at an arraignment hearing in New York.

Shahzad's charges include: attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction, possession of a firearm in relation to conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction, attempted act of terrorism transcending national boundaries, conspiracy to commit an act of terrorism, attempted use of a destructive device in relation to conspiracy to commit an act of terrorism, and conspiracy to destroy property be fire and explosives. A 30 year old, naturalized citizen of the United States, Shahzad, will most likely face a life sentence in prison. The defendant was arrested attempting to flee the country two days after his failed bomb plot in Times Square on May 1, 2010.

At his hearing, Shahzad, who became a US citizen in April 2009, was asked to explain the reasoning behind his actions. He retold his account of a trip to Pakistan that he took starting in June 2009. During the trip, he said that he travelled to Waziristan, Pakistan to join the Taliban, where he received bomb training from the Tehrik-i-Taliban. It was during this time that he first formulated his attack on Times Square.  It was also around this time that people close to Shahzad noticed a change in his personality and behaviour.

Shahzad, who was reported as cooperating well with the authorities since his arrest, was calm and unrepentant during his hearing. The New York Times reported Shahzad as saying:

"I want to plead guilty, and I'm going to plead guilty 100 times over because until the hour the US pulls its forces from Iraq and Afghanistan, and stops the drone strikes in Somalia and Yemen and in Pakistan, and stops the occupation of Muslim lands, and stops killing the Muslims, and stops reporting the Muslims to its government, we will be attacking US, and I plead guilty to that."

It is statements of this nature that are most troubling. Shahzad showed no remorse for targeting children and tourists, instead claiming that these are justifiable targets. How can the US or any country for that matter, combat extremists that are so set in their beliefs that they can justify the massacre of innocent civilians? Shahzad cites the murder of innocents in Afghanistan and Iraq as justification for his actions, failing to recognize the difference between a targeted strike with the risk of civilian casualty and an attack with the goal of solely killing civilians who are unaware and unprotected. The US government must find the catalyst that flipped Shahzad's view of the US from the land of opportunity to the oppressor and minimize its effects before more of its own citizens begin to turn against it.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.socialcohesion.co.uk/mt2/mt-tb.cgi/440

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Robin Simcox published on June 22, 2010 3:35 PM.

The 'Conservative Muslim Forum' has some explaining to do was the previous entry in this blog.

Does the government have a control orders policy? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.